Monday, April 18, 2011

Poscast with my baseball hero

The Poscast with Duane Kuiper

There's a baseball bat in my office that I sometimes pick up when stuck between paragraphs. I don't swing the bat, at least not at full speed. No, I put it up against my shoulder and walk around with it for a little while. I let it quiver behind my head as I imagine standing in against fastballs. After a while, I put the bat down and return to my writing. I could say that the bat helps me think, a wooden muse, but that's not exactly right. I could say the bat clarifies things in my head, sharpens them, and that's true ... but no that's not quite right either. The bat reminds me exactly why I do this ... and maybe why someone keeps paying me to do it ... and maybe why I got so lucky.


* * *

One of the wonder of our games. I think, is that they are exactly as important or unimportant as you make them. A pitcher could throw a perfect game in the seventh game of the World Series, and it wouldn't mean much of anything to my mother, for instance.* On the other hand, an intentional walk to Yuni Betancourt in a June Brewers-Marlins game might set me off on a 5,000-word post. It is not just perspective, it is commitment. It is all about how deeply you want to enter the world.

*Then again: what happens on Dancing With The Stars and American Idol means quite a lot to her, and absolutely nothing to me. All depends on your world.

When I was 10, I wrapped myself in the world of the 1977 Cleveland Indians. I don't recall this being much of a choice, but looking back on it I guess it was a choice. Nobody I knew cared as much. Even though we were all 10 in school, there was a cynical strain running through the other kids in my class, and they mostly made the entirely sensible and terribly unromantic decision that the Indians were not worthy of their best hopes. Even by then, more than 30 years ago, the Indians had not been to the World Series in almost 25 years -- an impossibly long stretch of time to a 10-year-old -- and the last time Cleveland HAD reached the World Series it was upset and swept and humiliated by the New York Giants. The Indians were of great interest, of course, because we were kids, and they were our baseball team. But the other kids in school seemed to understand what I plainly did not ... that the Cleveland Indians were not very good at baseball.

I pinned my hopes on them every year -- full, unabashed, unchained hopes. I was not much into analysis. To me, Rick Waits could be Ron Guidry. Why couldn't he? Rick Manning could be Fred Lynn. Buddy Bell could be George Brett. Jim Kern could be Goose Gossage. Charlie Spikes could be Dave Parker. I believed in the depth of potential, the certainty that any of us could wake up tomorrow and be someone else, someone better. I was, at the time, the shortest kid in class, the one wearing the thick glasses, the kid who so clearly wasn't the smartest or the most athletic or most artistic or most musical or most anything.

But tomorrow, who knows? I kept believing in the power of tomorrow morning.

Duane Kuiper was my hero on those Indians teams. There was an uncomplicated reason for this. Kuip played second base and I played second base. When you are 10, you don't need much more than that. The kid next door can be your best friend because ... he's the kid next door. Accessibility is 90% of everything when you are 10.

That said, I'm not sure that if I had played shortstop that Frank Duffy would have been my hero. There was something Duane Kuiper, something about the way he played baseball that deepened and strengthened the connection. I've tried to explain it before ... Duane Kuiper, I feel quite certain, dived for more ground balls than any player of his era. Players would later tell me they called him "Step and a dive Kuiper," and that matches my memory. He was ALWAYS on the ground. This seems kind of a funny thing now, a quirky thing, but then it only meant to me that Duane Kuiper cared more and made more plays than anyone else. It never occurred to me, not even once, that perhaps other second basemen, like the regal Frank White, were making the same plays standing up. I can assure you that no one in the South Euclid Little League dived for more ground balls than I did.

Duane's weaknesses as a player have been well-covered on this blog. He could not get on base as often as you might hope for an every day player -- his .325 career on-base percentage was below league average. He could not run particularly fast. His stolen base percentage -- he stole 52 bases and was caught 71 times -- is one of the worst in baseball history. Most famously, he hit one home run in a startlingly long career.

And yet, the career was long. Kuip got 1,000 games in the big leagues -- more than any non-pitcher with one or fewer homers. Why did he play so long? I didn't know for sure as a kid, but I'm sure I sensed it. Everybody loved Duane Kuiper. They loved how hard he played. They loved the cheerful attitude he brought with him to every game. They loved the knowledge that he would dive for every ground ball, and that he would almost always put the ball in play, and that he would play with everything he had all the time. It is human nature, I think, to lean to the C+ person who is giving everything over the B- person who is not. Duane Kuiper exuded joy and effort. For a 10-year-old boy entirely certain that he had been given no particular talents, that made Kuip everything I wanted to be.

* * *

I've written this before ...  I never once, my entire childhood, had anyone tell me that I could write well. Not once. I know people in this crazy journalism business, a lot of them, who have always known their destiny, who started neighborhood newspapers when they were 3, who broke the story of lunchroom corruption when they were in the fifth grade, who wrote their first novel at 11. I meet more and more young people who know their destiny, and I admire and am even a bit jealous of their conviction.

Because no one ever told me that I could write, I was obsessed in my early journalism years with the concept of "talent." I would ask myself (and anyone who would listen) the same question: Am I TALENTED enough to make a living as a sportswriter? The answers were generally unsatisfying. None of my closest friends knew any sportswriters. My parents did not know any sportswriters. And so, it was a foreign world for them. Was I talented enough? How would they know? I wasn't a bad speller. I put too many commas in my sentences -- cut down on those. Try not to use too many big words. Beyond that, though, none of them could really help me. Was I talented enough? The best plan, everyone agreed, seemed to be to keep doing it until they called me in and made me turn in my playbook.

But, it turns out, that plan was exactly right for me. It was the plan I had unknowingly learned from Duane Kuiper. See, he played in the big leagues without speed and without power, he played in the big leagues by showing up every day filled with energy and life and the stubbornness to dive for every ground ball, the hunger to put the ball in play over and over in the hopes that enough of them would squeeze through. Now, years later, I realize that THIS is talent too, maybe the most useful talent, the talent of the every day. I worked absurdly hard ... I really did. I read everything. I wrote constantly. I traveled as far away as they would let me, to the smallest towns they could find, to write the stories that would appeal to the fewest people. And I did it all joyfully, because in time I found that I loved writing about as much as Duane Kuiper loved baseball. That was my talent. I loved this stuff.

I once heard Bruce Springsteen talk about the story behind one of his songs. And when he finished explaining the song, line for line, he said something like this: "How much of this was I actively thinking when I wrote the song? None of it. But how much of it was INSIDE me when I wrote this song? All of it." That's what I think about my connection to Duane Kuiper. I was just a short 10-year-old kid with glasses who lived in Cleveland. Had I grown up in Kansas City, I'm sure my hero would have been Frank White. Had I grown up in New York, it would have been Willie Randolph. Had I grown up in Boston, it might have been Rick Burleson. So when I flopped around and pretended to be Duane Kuiper day after day -- in the backyard, in my basement, on the diamond-hard Little League fields of Bexley Park -- I was not thinking about how much that connection would shape my life.

But all of it was inside me. I'm a prisoner of narrative -- one of the hazards of the job, I suppose -- but I remain convinced that a part of how I ended up doing what I'm doing and living the lucky life I live was that when I was a kid I watched Duane Kuiper play baseball and wanted to be just like him.

* * *

It was inevitable, I suppose, that Duane Kuiper would find out that he was my hero. I mean, I wrote about it a lot. Duane, as longtime announcer for the Giants, was certain to hear about it.

Duane is an extremely modest man ... he knows exactly what kind of player he was. And, at the same time, I think he takes a lot of pride in his career, as he should. He played in the big leagues! How many people can say that? What's more, he STARTED in the big leagues! Of all the kids in the world who play baseball, he was one of the few to reach the pinnacle, to really live the dream, and he loved it, every minute of it.

And, deep down, I think most ballplayers, maybe even all ballplayers, would love to think that they inspired someone. I would love to ask Barry Bonds that question. He seemed so bitter at times, so angry at times, so cheated at times ... but deep down I can't help but wonder: Didn't he want to believe that there was a kid out there -- maybe a bitter kid, maybe an angry kid, maybe a kid who felt cheated by life -- who watched him play and was inspired and became something he might not have otherwise become? Corny, sure, but don't we all wish that just a little bit?

I know Duane wished it. In a long history of baseball players, Duane Kuiper does not stand out except for the single home run he hit off Steve Stone. But in his own history, in his own life, his is a remarkable story. He is the son of a Wisconsin dairy farmer. To this day, he wakes up early every morning. He worked hard on the farm, and he worked hard at baseball, making himself the best player he could become. I know Duane wished that there was someone, maybe a few someones, out there who were just a little bit inspired by his story.

A year or so ago, a long tubular package came by mail. It was in my office when I first saw it. I opened it up ... and inside was a Duane Kuiper used bat. He thought I might like it.

Whenever I'm stuck between paragraphs, I pick up that bat and let it remind me ... of something ... something as important to me as just about anything.

* * *

This week, as mentioned, the Poscast is with Duane Kuiper. Among the many great bits her shared was this: Duane is almost certainly the only player of recent vintage, probably ever, to seriously consider failing a physical so that he could stay in Cleveland. He is, undoubtedly, the only person to get married in Hawaii and honeymoon in Cleveland. He is also the greatest guy in the world; there's no better feeling than having your hero live up to all your expectations and go beyond.

45 comments:

  1. Been waiting for this for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great essay. When I was a kid one of my coaches had a poster up in his office that said "The race is not always to the swift but to those who keep on running." Almost 30 years later I still think about that all the time. Looking forward to the Kuipcast.

    ReplyDelete
  3. " He is, undoubtedly, the only person to get married in Hawaii and honeymoon in Cleveland."

    This alone could be the subject of a major post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The difference between Duane Kuiper and you Joe - you have many more home runs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joe,

    We've met.
    Clay Horning, sports editor of The Norman Transcript.
    The guy who started reading you when you wrote about how Terry Allen, KU coach, wouldn't run up the score even though his players, who hardly ever had such opportunity, wanted to so much. I mentioned all of this to you. Well, when we met, you were very gracious, allowing me to talk to you through a quick dinner, I think at the lounge at the Dallas Anatole. Anyway, the experience you had with Kuiper, I had with you (I also had it, strangely enough, when I met the Nature Boy Ric Flair, my wrestling hero). I even have a theory that many more of the greats are gracious and humble than are not. I could be wrong about that. Perhaps I've just been lucky. Also, great blog. I always enjoy it when you write about writing. Thanks Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Having grown up on a dairy farm, I like Duane Kuiper more now than I did 10 minutes ago! Great post, Joe!
    Now I need to Google "Bexley Park in South Euclid, OH"?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bexley Park looks quite nice via the satellite image. Thanks again, Joe!

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you grew up in Boston, you would be a Jerry Remy fan. Rick Burleson was a SS.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Awesome.

    I'm not sure why I'm reading about a bat, then I'm reading about a player, and then, all of a sudden, pieces magically dropping into place, I'm being told about the link between the bat and the player, and why the bat was worth talking about in the first place.

    But the other upshot is, and I wonder whether Joe has considered this, that Duane Kuiper would be almost universally despised today, and anybody who attempted to defend the guy as a hero or a hard-worker or even as a dairy farmer would be ridiculed on stat-oriented sites across the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't swing the bat, at least not at full speed

    Don't worry, neither did Kuiper.

    What I want to know is how many years the local sports editor waited to use the headline "Kuiper Belt!"

    I imagine him setting it in print, restless, on a rainy afternoon. He looks at it, sighs, and goes about his day.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't know rastronomicals - Nick Punto still has plenty of fans out there.

    Great stuff, Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Shouldn't that read "single home run he hit off future Cy Young winner Steve Stone"? :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. True, Tarnished Crown, but Remy didn't arrive in Boston until '78, so a New England Joe might have already been in the tank for Denny Doyle.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The .mp3 link is this:

    http://ht.cdn.turner.com/si/joe_posnanski/audio/2011/04/18/poscast004.mp3

    I don't know if Joe/SI wants the stand-alone link out (I assume they want people to stream it using the SI player), but I'll keep posting the .mp3 link each week until I'm told not to (or until Joe starts doing so). Enjoy, those of you not using iTunes!

    ReplyDelete
  15. As always, brilliant stuff, Joe. As a Giants fan, I have the pleasure of listening to Kuip (along with Mike Krukow) every day narrating Giants games. Kuip is as good as it gets in the broadcast booth (deserved of his nickname, "Smooth"), and is a fantastic guy. It's good to see good, solid guys get some recognition.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey, Denny Doyle is truthfully the only autograph I have ever asked for in person, as an 8 year old Cub Scout in south Jersey!

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  17. This may be what the Joe Morgans of the world are complaining about when they complain about advanced stats ruining the beauty of baseball. Advanced stats are all about crushing irrational hope and belief. They're worse than regular old fashioned stats because they're even better at crushing irrational hope and belief than the regular old fashioned stats were.
    Sabermetrics and Bill James might have made us smarter and more right with all of our advanced stats, but still it's a kind of loss that we can no longer believe that Jack Morris was the best pitcher of his generation or that Derek Jeter will be a brilliant defender forever, even if we were wrong in our belief. It's a bit like seeing Raiders of the Lost Ark for the first time and having a guy behind you whispering every five minutes, "it's not real." He may be factually correct, but after the third or fourth time you'd want to stand up and punch that guy in the face.
    I also see some commenters on articles about the Royals' hot start and last fall about the Chiefs' unexpected success prophesying their respective downfalls and criticizing everyone else's rose colored glasses. Ultimately I think they're probably right in their analysis, but I also think it’s sad that the price they’re paying for being right is being counted out in fun since, except for sports professionals and professional gamblers, “fun” seems like the only justification for even following sports.
    I’m a bit of a math geek and so I love stats and I’m sure stats have made general managers better at putting together their teams and perhaps even made some managers better at coaching their teams, but how much better off is the casual sports fan if they’re constantly coming across “proof” that they’re heroes aren’t all that they thought they were?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Well said, Chris. I do math for a living, and so ever since I heard about sabermetrics, I've been drawn to it. The idea that we can peel back unimportant things and study those things that really matter is fascinating to an engineer. At the same time, I'm only a fan of sports at all because it's fun. Like Joe, I often take it too seriously and assign great importance to it. Occasionally, the Royals provide the appearance of not sucking and pull me back in. And so tonight, I'll settle onto the couch hoping to watch them battle for first place as a little league shortstop who's mom wouldn't let him have a toothpick in his mouth like U.L. Washington and not as somebody bothered by Dayton Moore's idea of what makes a good big league catcher.

    And if Alcides Escobar drives in the winning runs with a bases-loaded double, well...take that stat nerds.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Is that what happened to Wonderbat?

    ReplyDelete
  20. The numbers are great and fascinating in and of themselves, and they belong -- as long as we don't let them ruin our fascination with the individual moments in the game. We might know that if Craig Counsell comes up in a tie game with 2 outs in the bottom of the 9th that there's pretty much no chance he'll hit a home run to win it, but...

    ...well, it IS possible. And as long as we remember one truth about the numbers, we'll be fine: the numbers tell us what *probably* will happen, but can never, ever tell us what *actually* will happen.

    Great piece, Joe...if Duane Kuiper instilled the same confidence in you as a youth as he does for me in the broadcast booth, you were a lucky fan, indeed. He has the precisely correct attitude, mannerism, and delivery for the game of baseball: relaxed, not rushed, but is ready to rise to the moments as soon as they happen.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Robert and Chris, true, advanced stats pull the rug out from under us when we think about guys like Jeter and Morris. But for every one of those guys, there's a Tim Raines or a Bert Blyleven that looks better in the light of advanced stats - guys who look just OK in terms of traditional numbers, but when we look in more depth, we can see just how great they were.

    There's a certain magic to sabermetrics, I think, just as there's a certain magic to baseball without them. I like the advanced stuff because I'm more convinced that what I'm reading there is correct in addition to being fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Persistence of vision certainly trumps talent - unfortunately I didn't learn that lesson until later in life. I kept thinking that a talent in something would emerge one day - that just doesn't happen for most people. At least you were good enough to play second base - I was a terrible athlete.

    As far as writing goes I think the reason you never got positive feedback is simply the fact that people rarely, if ever, read something written by an amateur. Short story magazines have more authors submitting works than they do subscribers. Trying to get someone to read even a short piece, like a 1000 word article, can be a monumental task.

    BTW if you click on my name it will take you to my Blog ... crickets .... 8^)

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'd love it if Kuiper could be a semi-regular guest. He told great stories today.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think we would have traded baseball cards if we had lived in the same neighborhood growing up. I can still remember the picture of Duane Kuiper on one of my 1978 baseball cards with his earless helmet and long hair of the day. As I lived in Kansas and baseball wasn't on tv every single night like today, the baseball cards became the story of the players. Many Indians cards always stood out for some reason (I could never get a Royals George Brett card in a pack but always got millions of Indians players!).

    Great blog and story of your own perserverance. It's always amazing that when someone "makes it" like you have, the assumption is that you knew all along that you would. It's easy to see why since many of us have read your work for so long but the fact that you weren't ever sure of your own talent demonstrates that not only are you deserving of all of your success, your humility speaks of your character. Thanks Joe!

    ReplyDelete
  25. The lesson of Duane Kuiper as a baseball player is that greatness is relative.

    Because Duane Kuiper was great. He was a first-round pick with 1000 major league games.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Mikey

    That quote in full is: "The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong . . . but that's the way to bet."

    @Daniel

    There are no figures that will tell you what *probably* will happen . . . unless you mean make an out, which is how more than 50% of at-bats end.

    — Graphite

    ReplyDelete
  27. just got a plug from KNBR post game wrap with Jon, Dave, Duane, Mike. going to listen to the 40 min interview from the kitchen.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Chris and Robert - I see what you're saying, but don't forget that for every former hero the advanced stats reveal as a mere mortal, there's an unappreciated great who finally gets his due. Would Blyleven be in the HOF without the stats crowd? I'll take a few shattered illusions if it helps shine a light on hidden greatness every now and again.

    And Chris, speaking of Joe Morgan, it kills me that he's so anti-stats. The advanced stats end up revealing that Morgan himself was even better than most people thought he was at the time (and they rightly thought he was great). It's too bad that the whole stats "controversy" ended up making a laughingstock (in certain circles at least) out of a guy that they should have made even more of a legend than he already was.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Fred Patek was my guy when I was young. He was short, I was short. We both played shortstop. Sometimes that's all it takes. I have met my share of athletes over the years, but when I met Fred Patek, I was instantly 8 years old again, nervous and babbling.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Robert- always keep the math guy and the little boy separate. I have never let the numbers get in the way of rooting for a Bill Pecota, David Eckstein, or any other guy who makes the most of their talent. I will be a fan of Tim Collins because I know how much better a guy that short has to be just to make it to the big leagues as a pitcher. (Despite the disastrous results tonight)

    I love the marginal player, who has to bring something extra to the table just to make it. It does not take away from, or get spoiled by, the numbers geek inside me.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Gil - thanks for nit-picking! It gave me a warm and fuzzy, and also made me pretty certain you missed the entire point. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Graphite - I think the quote on the poster actually derives from a passage from scripture although I couldn't give you the chapter and verse. The quote you referenced is I think from Damon Runyon.

    ReplyDelete
  33. "Duane Kuiper, I feel quite certain, dived for more ground balls than any player of his era."

    Carney Lansford, maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @timifill I completely agree with everything you've said and appreciate what stats have done for us, but I can understand if someone says that appreciating players via advanced stats is a little bit like deciding you enjoyed a carton of ice cream only after you've read the label.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "I would love to ask Barry Bonds that question."

    Poz, I would LOVE it if someday you were able to write a with-access but without-prejudice biography of Barry Bonds.

    Obviously there is a fascinating story there that has never been completely told, and you have written in the past that Bonds — not known for congeniality with the media — has always treated you reasonably well. Maybe he'd cooperate.

    So much of the stuff that has been written about Bonds in newspapers, magazines and books (and court reports) has come from people with an axe to grind (perhaps justifiably so). I would love to see you spend some time with him to see if you could uncover his better side... and if it turned out that YOU found him to be an irredeemable jerk, then we'd know it wasn't just a case of him being misunderstood.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Chris, I totally get that, but I think it's possible to try to understand the game as deeply as you can, but still appreciate what's in front of you. After all, I consider myself a stats guy, yet I still own a Chris Coste t-shirt jersey and rooted hard for that guy, despite knowing that in the scheme of major league baseball, he wasn't all that good.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Beautiful essay. I just have to add, "He *does* think better with that bat."

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm pretty sure Joe Posnanski knows that Rooster Burleson was a shortstop. That's why he wrote that had he grown up in Boston he might have rooted for Burleson.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Mikey

    You are right on both counts.

    From Ecclesiastes: "...the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all."

    My guess why your guy didn't have the full quote is that he didn't favour the "time and chance" bit. He was more likely stressing the "never give up" sentiment of the opening phrase. Whatever, I prefer the Runyon version.

    @Daniel

    My apologies. It was nitpicky when you were making the same point I was trying to emphasise . . . on a game by game basis – and especially in an at-bat by at-bat situation – stats are worthless.

    It was the word "probably" that got me.

    — Graphite

    ReplyDelete
  40. just banging the "probably" stat idea a little more... The most likely occurance in baseball? That a half inning will have zero runs scored.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I am a Kenyan living in Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi is a long way from Kansas or Cleveland. Being Kenyan,naturally, I don't watch baseball(what I'm ? An American?)I have never and probably never will watch a baseball game. Which is fine because, again, I am Kenyan. But if I ever, magically, find myself on some Game Show where the million dollar question is a baseball question, I am the one Kenyan most likely to know the answer.
    I would know it because I read your blog. I visit it everyday because I like the way you write. I love your sentences. And the candor in the writing. You sir, do love writing and when I become a writer, I want to become just like you, sans the baseball , of course.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I love this blog, and there have been dozens of posts by Joe that I thought were incredible. My favorite post of all, though, was the original post about receiving the bat from Duane Kuiper.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Speaking of that post, it looks like the archives here only go back to last September--is there a way to search the archives beyond that? Does anyone have a link to that post?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Aces. Just fan-f***ing-tastic. We love Kuip (and Kruk).

    ReplyDelete
  45. I have been a SF Giants fan since they moved here. I had the pleasure of meeting Duane Kuiper and getting a personal tour of the then new ball park broadcasting facilities. My big brother, who is a friend of Duane's, introduced us and arranged the tour. My brother also took me to my first major league game at the old Seals Stadium. The Giants' fans have been truly blessed with great announcers, three of who are in Cooperstown, and there is no doubt in my mind that Duane, a true professional and gentleman, should join them.

    ReplyDelete